Republic vs. Cesar Guy
G.R. No. 41399

FACTS: August 18,1956, Cesar Guy filed with the Court of First Instance a petition to be admitted as a citizen of the Philippines. The petition was given due course and after hearing, the Court issued order granting the application for citizenship of Cesar Guy. December 22, 1959, Two years later the trial court issued order allowing Cesar Guy to take his oath of allegiance as citizen of the Philippines, he took his oath the same day and then issued Certificate of Naturalization No. 27.
September 23,1964, the Solicitor General filed petition with the court for the cancellation of the Certificate of Naturalization issued to Cesar Guy on the ground that the same was obtained fraudulently or illegally.
--June 7, 1957 Cesar Guy filed with Bureau of Forestry a sworn application for the issuance of an ordinary timber license where he stated that he was a Filipino citizen though he was not.
--He was found guilty of the crimes that demonstrating an utter lack of good moral character and has ceased to possess the qualifications to be naturalized citizen of the Philippines.
Cesar Guy claimed that he acted in good faith in applying for an ordinary timber license believing that he is already a citizen of the Philippines because of the favorable decision on his naturalization case.
May 28, 1974, the trial court ordered the cancellation of Certificate of Naturalization No. 27, previously issued to Cesar Guy, “in view of his conducts which resulted in his conviction for the crimes of perjury and rape, acts clearly indicative of his lack of one the important qualifications, that is good moral character”.

 ISSUE: Whether or not the convictions of the appellant for certain crimes he committed after the probationary period is a valid ground for the cancellation of his Certificate of Naturalization.

 HOLDING: Yes, because the fact that his convictions for the said crime were made after the 2 years probationary period and after the appellant had already been granted his citizenship unlike final decisions in actions and other proceedings in court, a decision or order granting citizenship to the applicant does not really become executory, and a naturalization proceeding not being a judicial adversary proceeding, the decision rendered therein is not res judicata, the certificate of naturalization may be cancelled upon grounds or conditions subsequent to the granting of the certificate of naturalization. 
The crime of perjury and rape undisputedly involves moral turpitude. Person convicted of said offense cannot be said to be possessed of good moral character, an indispensable requirement for one applying for Philippine citizenship. Hence, having been able to obtain Philippine citizenship despite this misconduct, rendered his acquisition thereof fraudulent and illegal. Consequently, the certificate of naturalization issued to him under these circumstances was properly cancelled by the court.
The judgment appealed was affirmed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

People vs. Sunico, et al [C.A., 50 o.g. 5880]

FACTS: The accused were election inspectors and poll clerks whose duty among others was to transfer the names of excess voters in other precincts to the list of a newly created precinct.Several voters were omitted in the list.Because their names were not in the list, some of them were not allowed to vote. The accused were prosecuted for violation of Secs. 101 and 103 of the Revised Election Code. The accused claimed that they made the omission in good faith.The trial court seemed to believe that notwithstanding the fact that the accused committed in good faith the serious offense charged, the latter are criminally responsible therefor, because such offense is malum prohibitum, and, consequently, the act constituting the same need not be committed with malice or criminal intent to be punishable. ISSUE: Is the act of the accused merely a mala prohibita? HELD: The acts of the accused cannot be merely mala prohibita - they are mala in se . The omission or failure to include a voter’s...
Read more

US v. Serapio [23 P 584]

FACTS: Defendant was charged with the crime of libel. Upon said complaint the defendant was duly arraigned. Upon arraignment the defendant, by his attorneys, presented the following demurrer:I. The facts alleged in the complaint do not constitute a crime. II. It appears from the allegation in the complaint that if there were a crime it has prescribed. With reference to the second ground, counsel for the defense maintains that the crime has prescribed under the provisions of the laws in force in the Islands and supports such conclusion by asserting that in the absence of a definite provision in Act No. 277 of the Philippine Commission, which fixes the time during which the penal action arising from the crime of libel may be exercised, the time which article 131 of the Penal Code fixes for the prescription of the crimes of calumny and insults is strictly applicable. Against this contention of the defense, the Attorney-General and the private prosecutor maint...
Read more

People v Macatanda [109 S 35]

FACTS: Charged with and convicted on a plea of guilty, in the Court of First Instance of Lanao del Norte, Branch IV in Iligan City, for the crime of cattle rustling, Saglala Macatanda. From the judgment of conviction, Saglala Macatanda (hereinafter referred to as appellant) appealed direct to this Court. The Solicitor General comes up with a reply that Article 64 of the Revised Penal Code does not apply to penalties prescribed by special laws. He considers P.D. 533, otherwise known as "Anti- Cattle Rustling Law of 1974" as a special law, and in accordance with existing rulings, 8 the penalty should not be governed by the Revised Penal Code. ISSUE: Whether the contention of the Solicitor-General is valid. RULING: The court do not agree with the Solicitor General that P.D. 533 is a special law, entirely distinct from and unrelated to the Revised Penal Code. From the nature of the penalty imposed which is in terms of the classification and duration of penalties as prescribe...
Read more